Permanent Fostering
Milton Keynes’ permanent fostering processes provide a formal structure for decision making regarding fostering placements that are intended to provide the child/young person with stability to adulthood. While not offering the level of legal security that an adoption, Special Guardianship or Child Arrangements Order can provide, use of the formal process is intended to quality assure, safeguard and support the child’s placement.
Permanent fostering is distinguished in Milton Keynes from long term fostering. Permanent fostering is when a child’s placement with a foster carer has been formally assessed and the match formally agreed by the fostering Panel and the foster carer/s’ registration is amended to reflect the formal match to child. Presentation to the fostering Panel is a celebratory event for the child and foster carers to celebrate the commitment being made to the child by the foster carer/s. Long term fostering on the other hand refers to a placement in which a child may have remained for some time (perhaps due to attempts at rehabilitation or court processes), but where the child’s future placement has not been formally assessed and match agreed by fostering Panel as permanent. This could be in cases where it is evident the foster carers are committed to caring for a child or young person long term and the placement is considered the best or most appropriate placement for the child but the foster carers are not in a position to commit to a formal permanently matched arrangement. This is also sometimes likely to be the case with young people over the age of 14, who may have entered the care system in adolescence, and who may not feel or want a commitment into adulthood from the current foster carer.
Improved planning, reduced court timescales and careful monitoring of cases has reduced the number of cases of children and young people who were placed with short term carers which have become long term by default. These procedures set out requirements to ensure that standards applied to cases where children have become established with their current carers, or when a permanent fostering placement is to be sought, result in the best outcomes for children and young people.
Situations where a child or young person has become attached to a carer in a long term placement, (where the best outcome for them will be achieved through the placement continuing), must be distinguished from applications from short term carers who decide they want to keep the child permanently during the course of care proceedings, in contradiction to the local authority’s plans. In the latter situation robust analysis and evidence must be presented by the local authority to the court regarding the plan for the child or young person to achieve permanence through a carefully planned alternative placement.
See Appendix 1: Practice Guidance - Considering the Ability of the Carers to Offer Permanence.
The child may know the carer well, but will need to be helped to understand the change of role. The implications of the transition should be supported and explained to the child.
When a child is already part of the foster family different approaches can be used to trigger discussion, depending on the age and understanding of the child. Appendix B in “Achieving Permanence in Foster Care” (2008) suggests a number of options, for drawing, discussing photos, writing ‘school reports’ on foster carers, using chess pieces, and sculpts.
Direct work of this nature can then be used to inform the permanence plan, and accompanying reports.
When a plan of Permanent Foster care is under consideration, a Permanency Planning meeting should be co-ordinated by the child’s social worker and chaired by the Team Manager for the child. A Permanency Planning Meeting should always be held prior to the child coming into care where permanent fostering may be considered. The fostering social worker or fostering duty must be involved as the decisions regarding placement and matching are a key consideration for children who are entering care for the first time. Foster carers and children/young people must be sensitively prepared for entry into care. Foster care profiles are available which should be shared with children and young people entering into care.
See Permanence Planning Guidance for detailed procedures. The purpose of the meeting is to draw together information held on the child, so that the plan can be agreed, and future support and services can be planned.
In practical terms the future accommodation needs of the carers’ family will need to be fully assessed, with a view to whether it will be adequate for a young person as they mature; or for a child who may have additional needs as they grow older etc.
It is particularly important to consider the future ability of the carer to meet the child’s needs. Care should be taken where it has not been possible to find a suitable adoptive match for a child e.g. due to lack of available adopters who can address issues of religion, ethnicity or culture; or where the child has a complex background or needs. While the carer may be providing an acceptable placement for the child at their current stage of development, the long term issues will need careful assessment.
In complex cases, where for example, there have been a number of placements, or changes of worker, a life appreciation meeting should be convened, so that the past social workers, professionals and carers who know the child can pool the information they have, and this can then be used to piece together full information to inform future placements. Advice on life appreciation meetings is available from Adoption Duty or the Adoption Team.
(i) Milton Keynes County Council approved foster carers already caring for the child
If a match is to be taken forward with an existing MKC carer, regardless of how long the child has been in their care, this will need formalising through the Fostering Panel. Some carers may find this intrusive but it is important to explain that this is aimed at ensuring the placement is supported and agreed as permanent.
Although permanency with an existing carer may appear as a foregone conclusion to all concerned, particularly for those children who have been in placement for some time, it is crucial to assess first before making a final decision.
The child’s social worker and fostering social worker should complete Part 2 and Part 3 of the Matching Meeting Report prior to the Matching Meeting.
A matching meeting, chaired by the Fostering Team Manager of the Fostering Support Team should be held to discuss the capacity of the carer to continue to look after the child or young person in to adulthood. This may be combined with the Permanency Planning Meeting if the social workers, managers and IRO involved are confident that the carer is to be supported and Part 2 and Part 3 of the Matching Meeting report has been completed prior to the meeting.
The child’s social worker should always produce the Permanency Planning Meeting minutes, an up to date Care Plan and Chronology for the Matching Meeting, a summary of these documents will be included in the Matching Meeting Report presented to the Fostering Panel.
Permanency with existing and new foster carers will be heard by the Fostering Panel in the local area within two months of the Matching Meeting. Requirements for Panel include:
- Panel Front Sheet - Introduction to Report;
- Matching Meeting Report including support plan – using the new template and chaired by the Fostering Team Leader.
- Previous Panel Minutes (if applicable), if within the first year must be included;
- Panel Checklist – updated Permanent Fostering panel checklist.
When a match is agreed by the decision maker, following the panel, (s)he will write to the carers explaining the permanency decision and a copy of the letter is sent to the child’s social worker for the file, The child’s social worker informs birth parents of the decision. This is the point at which the placement is re-designated as permanent.
If the match is not agreed the case will be referred to the fostering service who will assist in finding another match.
(ii) Family finding for new permanent foster carers
If the child cannot remain with the current carer, the child’s social worker should seek the advice of the fostering team in finding a permanent family for the child.
In cases where the decision to seek permanent foster carers has been arrived at due to an adoptive family not being available, then the advice of the Social Worker for Adoption Resources should be sought regarding leaving the child in the ‘pool’ of children while other efforts to find permanence are made.
In such cases, when a permanent fostering placement is agreed then application should be made to revoke the Placement Order if this has not already been done.
The following steps should be taken:
- Permanency Planning Meeting;
- Consideration of plan at a Child in Care Review;
- Referral to Access to Resources Team regarding availability of any carers known to be offering permanency;
- If further home finding needed contact British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF) and consider advertising if necessary;
- Request to fostering to assess carers who may come forward for child but are not approved;
- Matching Meeting chaired by Fostering Team Manager of fostering support team;
- Milton Keynes County Council's Fostering Panel considers cases for new Permanent Carers with paperwork as required above.
(iii) Independent Fostering Agency Carers
Where the needs of the child require, in exceptional circumstances, a permanent match to be confirmed with a new, or existing Independent Fostering Agency’s carer, the steps below will be followed:
- Permanency Planning Meeting;
- Consideration of plan at Child in Care review;
- Commissioning team to negotiate terms regarding costs with the provider, a business case submitted to the Director;
- Matching Meeting chaired by Fostering Team Manager of fostering support team;
- Papers prepared by Independent Fostering Agency and child’s social worker as above;
- Independent Fostering Agency’s own panel to consider change of approval of carers;
- Placement panel (chaired by the Assistant Director) to consider (paperwork to be presented as above);
- Child and carers informed;
- Liberi record updated;
- Director writes to child and carer to confirm/congratulate.
Reviews for children in permanent placements need sensitive handling to ensure the permanency of the situation is recognised but that the child’s needs are paramount.
It is important during the matching process to consider and discuss with the carer their attitude to Reviews, do they understand that they will need to continue, and do they welcome that or see as a hindrance?
If the child is an unaccompanied minor the corporate parenting role is particularly significant, given the absence of parents or birth family to contribute to plans. The IRO will need to help the young person to understand the constraints on permanency planning in the context of asylum and immigration considerations (IRO Handbook 2010).
Minimum requirements for matters to be considered at reviews are set out in Schedule 7, The Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010. While these are requirements for all reviews, some issues will need to be tactfully addressed e.g. “whether the responsible authority should seek any change in the child’s legal status, for example an application to discharge the current order or for a new order by the responsible authority or the application by a carer for a Child Arrangements Order or Special Guardianship Order”. The IRO must address this, but should think creatively about how this can be dealt with without raising anxiety for the child, or seemingly undermining the agreed plan.
Leaving care practice must be flexible and sensitive to each young person and their foster and birth families. Leaving care workers must understand and respect each young person’s history and Permanence Plan
Before approaching the young person or attending the Child in Care review, the leaving care worker first needs to approach the current social worker to discuss the young person’s history, role and membership in the foster and birth family.
Work with the young person in a settled placement should start with a presumption of continuity in a long-term family. This may be continuity of residence or continuity of support.
It is important that permanent placements that are under stress are given the same attention and support that would be given to a birth family or adoptive family. A core stability group should be called to identify what support can be put in where there is a high level of instability in the placement.
Unless there are concerns for the safety of the child carer’s carers own children or other children in the family any move should be carefully planned.
If the situation cannot be retrieved, a disruption meeting will be held in line with Milton Keynes City Council’s disruption policy.
Permanent foster carers are expected to give 3 months notice to end a child’s placement as it is good practice and child focused to allow a reasonable period of time for alternative care arrangements to be made and to support the child through the transition. However like any other placement arrangement, this will always be in consideration of the risk or any other factors which may require the foster carers to end the placement quickly or sooner.
The change of plan must be formally agreed by a Child in Care review and a Permanency Planning Meeting should be held following disruption of a permanent fostering placement.
There is a summary of assessment issues for permanent foster carers identified by Schofield (2009) in ‘The Child Placement Handbook’ which includes physical and emotional availability in the early and late stages of placement; ability to see the world from the child’s point of view; acceptance of the child as who they are; a co-operative approach to care giving; and attitudes to family membership.
Schofield and Beek point out the potential strengths and difficulties for groups of carers offering permanence as follows:
- Those offering permanence from the outset:
- Strengths:
- Strong desire to parent;
- May have relevant professional/life/parenting experience;
- May have good physical and emotional availability;
- Choice to foster rather than adopt suggests sympathy with fostering ethos (especially face to face contact) from the outset.
- Difficulties:
- Clash or lack of fit with other children in family;
- Foster child failing to fill pre-existing ‘gap’ or need in family;
- Lack of experience with children.
- Strengths:
- Permanence after gaining short-term experience:
- Strengths:
- Good fostering experience;
- Clear motivation, shared by all family members;
- Congruence with practical and emotional needs of the family;
- Good understanding of the implications of a long-term commitment.
- Difficulties:
- Some family members not fully signed up to the plan;
- Full implications of long-term commitment not taken on board;
- Carers have particular skills with younger children but these do not develop to meet the needs of teenagers and young adults.
- Strengths:
- Permanence for a child already living in the family:
- Strengths:
- Child already has sense of foster home as a secure base and carers have confidence in their capacity to meet the child’s needs;
- Real sense of ‘fit’ (appearance interests, personalities etc) provides good foundation for future relationships;
- Child gains sense of being truly wanted - for who they are.
- Difficulties:
- All family members not fully signed up to plan;
- Inadequate assessment means that original motivation for short-term fostering resurfaces and threatens placement;
- Offer made too early, child not fully “known” to family.
- Strengths:
- Permanence for a specific child already known to them:
- Strengths:
- Foster carers motivated by strong feelings of compassion for particular circumstances of child;
- Familiarity of foster family with child and vice versa;
- Continuity of relationships, school, networks etc. for child;
- Less stigmatising for child than “stranger” carers;
- Child has sense of being truly wanted.
- Difficulties:
- Some family members not fully signed up to the plan;
- Full implications of long-term commitment not taken on board;
- Contact issues may become increasingly problematic if the carers’ loyalties are torn between the child’s needs and the wishes of birth family members.
- Strengths:
A discussion of the following areas will not only help to clarify future support, but cover the current motivation of the carers, for example:
- Supervision - do they have a good relationship with the Fostering Social Worker/and or other professionals. Are they able to use supervision to support meeting the outcomes for the child;
- What are the views of carer, parents and child about contact, and what support may be needed initially? Long term foster carers may have an existing relationship with the birth parents that will be affected by their new permanent caring role. This can change the view of contact between the child and birth parents making it particularly difficult for the carer to manage. If there are siblings living with the birth family how this will be managed?
- If the child is of a different culture, religion or ethnicity to the carer how can they be supported? What resources are available now, and what might be available when the child reaches a different developmental stage?
- What consent can be delegated to the carer - this will vary from child to child but the aim should be to delegate as much decision making to the carer as possible, as the child should feel that someone they know if making important decisions for them;
- If the permanent carer is continuing to foster other children, how will future placements be managed, and how will the child relate to other children being introduced to the household. The age range of other children to be placed may need to be reconsidered as the child develops;
- Do the carers expect respite? This will not be routine in a permanency placement, as the expectation is that the child is treated as a member of the family. Only in exceptional cases where it is beneficial to the child, and will assist with placement stability, should respite be planned and provided. This provision should be regularly reviewed;
- Do the carers understand that the legal situation will not change, and that reviews will continue? Clarification as to whether the visiting timeframes should be reduced to not more than 3 monthly (if child has been placed for over a year), and how much consent will be delegated to the carers.
Last Updated: November 13, 2023
v19
